Friday, April 27, 2007

21st Century Teaching

Last evening at our School Board meeting, I heard a presentation on the success of Greene Central Schools second year with their Reading First Grant. Sure having over $400,000 over 3 years to spend on materials, professional development and programming was a big help. But, the items that jumped out of the presentation for me were teaching and learning paradigm shifts that have resulted during these two years. The teachers said:

  • we no longer work in isolation, but as a team
  • each student is benchmarked and her progress checked regularly
  • extensive data is being used to discover a student's true levels
  • intervention is not completed by pulling out, but by adding
  • scientifically based researched reading programs are being implemented as needed
  • we know the level and progress of every child, not just the ones that are apparent
  • we have had such great training and support
  • special education referrals are going down

I think these bullets represent a shift toward 21st Century teaching. Doug Johnson, wrote in his Blue Skunk Blog some criteria for 21st Century teachers:

* are diagnosticians who use technology to help them create effective IEPs for all their kids using evaluation data that is accessed and manipulated electronically
* are masters of differentiated instruction
* communicate online easily
* can identify, organize and prescribe online learning activities
* are dynamic and engaging discussion leaders
* figure out new ways of teaming with other educators to specialize in learning styles rather than content areas

I see a clear correlation between these criteria and the Greene teachers' description of their work. Technology is the ubiquitous tool used to make these things happen. From a child's computer project to the Palm Pilots used by teachers to record test scores, it is a major component of this success. We are onto something here.

The question that comes to mind is "Why can't we implement these strategies in all areas for all students"?


No comments: